Views: 222 Author: Dream Publish Time: 2025-04-15 Origin: Site
Content Menu
● Understanding Abutment Screw Loosening
>> Mechanism of Screw Loosening
● How Occlusal Forces Influence Abutment Screw Loosening
>> Impact on Stress Distribution
● Factors Affecting Abutment Screw Loosening
● Detailed Analysis of Occlusal Force Effects
>> 1. Vertical vs. Lateral Forces
>> 2. Magnitude and Frequency of Occlusal Loads
>> 3. Occlusal Scheme and Force Distribution
● Additional Factors Influencing Screw Loosening Related to Occlusal Forces
>> Micro-Movements and Micromotion
>> Material Properties and Fatigue
>> Influence of Prosthetic Superstructure
● Strategies to Minimize Screw Loosening Due to Occlusal Forces
>> Screw and Connection Selection
>> Torque Application and Maintenance
>> Occlusal Adjustment and Management
● FAQ
>> 1. What are the main factors affecting abutment screw loosening?
>> 2. How does occlusal force direction affect screw loosening?
>> 3. Can retightening the abutment screw prevent loosening?
>> 4. Which implant-abutment connection type is more resistant to screw loosening?
>> 5. How does prosthetic design influence occlusal forces and screw loosening?
Dental implants have revolutionized restorative dentistry, providing patients with durable and functional tooth replacements. However, one of the most common mechanical complications encountered in implant dentistry is the loosening of the abutment screw. This issue can compromise the stability of the implant-supported prosthesis, leading to discomfort, prosthetic failure, and additional clinical interventions. Among the various factors influencing abutment screw loosening, occlusal force plays a pivotal role. This article explores in depth how occlusal forces affect abutment screw loosening, the underlying mechanisms, contributing factors, and strategies to mitigate this problem.
The abutment screw is a critical component that connects the implant fixture to the prosthetic abutment. When tightened, the screw undergoes elastic deformation, generating a tensile force known as preload. This preload creates a clamping force that holds the implant and abutment together, ensuring joint stability. However, if external forces exceed this clamping force, the screw may loosen or even fracture.
- Preload and Clamping Force: The screw acts like a tensioned spring. The preload is the axial force generated by tightening the screw, which clamps the abutment and implant together.
- Loss of Preload: Over time, preload can decrease due to the settling effect, where microscopic irregularities on the contacting surfaces flatten under load, reducing the clamping force.
- External Forces: Occlusal forces, especially lateral or oblique forces, can generate separating forces that overcome the clamping force, leading to screw loosening.
Occlusal forces are the forces exerted on teeth and implants during biting, chewing, and parafunctional activities such as bruxism. These forces vary in magnitude, direction, and frequency, all of which affect the stability of the abutment screw.
- Vertical Forces: Directed along the long axis of the implant, generally less harmful to screw stability.
- Horizontal Forces: Lateral forces that create bending moments, increasing the risk of screw loosening.
- Oblique Forces: Combination of vertical and horizontal forces, often the most detrimental.
Finite Element Analysis (FEA) studies have shown that occlusal forces cause stress concentrations in specific areas of the implant-abutment complex:
- Maximum stresses are often concentrated at the lower portion of the abutment and the threaded portion of the abutment screw.
- Oblique forces increase stress on the abutment screw more than purely vertical or horizontal forces.
- Different implant systems show varying stress distribution patterns under occlusal loading.
- Posterior implants, which endure higher occlusal loads and more lateral forces, have a higher incidence of screw loosening compared to anterior implants.
- Wider occlusal tables and steep cuspal inclines increase lateral forces, contributing to screw loosening.
- Parafunctional habits such as bruxism significantly increase the risk due to repetitive high occlusal forces.
Occlusal force is a major factor, but several other elements influence the likelihood of screw loosening:
| Factor | Description |
|---|---|
| Occlusal Table Width | Wider occlusal tables increase lateral forces on the screw. |
| Cuspal Inclination | Steeper cusps generate more lateral forces during function. |
| Implant Location | Posterior implants face higher occlusal loads and more screw loosening. |
| Abutment Screw Design | Screw length, thread design, and surface treatment affect preload and resistance to loosening. |
| Type of Implant-Abutment Connection | Internal conical connections provide better resistance than external hex connections. |
| Torque Application | Proper torque and retightening reduce settling effect and maintain preload. |
| Microleakage | Fluid penetration at the implant-abutment interface can increase loosening risk. |
| Parafunctional Habits | Bruxism and clenching increase dynamic occlusal forces. |
| Abutment Angulation | Angulated abutments may experience different force vectors affecting screw stability. |
| Prosthesis Design | Cantilever extensions increase bending moments on screws. |
Vertical occlusal forces are generally axial and compressive, which implants and screws are designed to withstand. However, lateral and oblique forces introduce bending moments and shear stresses that challenge the screw's clamping force.
- Vertical Forces: Tend to increase preload slightly by compressing the joint.
- Lateral/Oblique Forces: Cause micro-movements and separation forces that reduce preload and promote loosening.
Repeated cyclic loading, especially with high magnitude forces, accelerates the loss of preload due to the settling effect and material fatigue.
- Studies simulating dynamic cyclic loading show increased removal torque loss after repeated loading cycles.
- Retightening screws after initial torque application can reduce the settling effect and improve long-term stability.
Different occlusal schemes influence how forces are distributed on implants:
- Group Function Occlusion (GFO): Distributes occlusal forces more evenly across multiple teeth, reducing stress on individual screws.
- Canine Guidance Occlusion (CGO): Concentrates forces on canines, potentially increasing stress on specific implants.
- Lingualized Occlusion (LO): Alters force vectors, affecting screw stress differently.
FEA studies suggest GFO may reduce screw loosening risk by balancing occlusal loads.
Occlusal forces, especially lateral and oblique, can induce micro-movements at the implant-abutment interface. These micromotions can:
- Cause gradual loss of preload by disrupting the screw's clamping force.
- Lead to wear and deformation of the screw threads and implant interface.
- Increase the risk of microleakage, which can further destabilize the connection.
The materials used for abutment screws (commonly titanium alloys) have excellent strength but are still susceptible to fatigue failure under repetitive occlusal loading.
- Cyclic loading can cause microscopic cracks that propagate over time.
- Fatigue failure often begins with screw loosening, making early detection critical.
The design and material of the prosthetic crown or bridge influence how occlusal forces are transmitted to the implant and screw.
- Rigid materials like zirconia transmit forces more directly, potentially increasing stress on screws.
- Flexible materials or shock-absorbing components can reduce peak forces.
- Avoid excessively wide occlusal tables to reduce lateral forces.
- Minimize steep cuspal inclines to decrease oblique force components.
- Limit cantilever lengths to reduce bending moments on screws.
- Use materials that can absorb or distribute occlusal forces effectively.
- Position implants to align with the direction of occlusal loads, minimizing lateral forces.
- Use angulation-correcting implants or angled abutments carefully to avoid unfavorable force vectors.
- Prefer internal conical connections for better stability and reduced micro-movement.
- Use screws with appropriate length, thread design, and surface treatment to maximize preload and resistance to loosening.
- Consider screws with anti-rotation features or coatings that enhance friction.
- Apply manufacturer-recommended torque using calibrated torque drivers to achieve optimal preload.
- Retighten screws after initial tightening to counteract the settling effect.
- Schedule regular follow-ups to monitor screw stability and retighten if necessary.
- Design occlusion to minimize lateral forces on implants.
- Use occlusal schemes like group function to distribute forces evenly.
- Manage parafunctional habits such as bruxism with night guards or behavioral therapy.
- Educate patients on avoiding excessive forces on implant-supported prostheses.
Occlusal forces significantly influence the stability of abutment screws in dental implants. While vertical forces are generally well tolerated, lateral and oblique forces increase the risk of screw loosening by generating separating forces that overcome the screw's clamping force. Factors such as occlusal table width, cuspal inclination, implant location, screw design, and occlusal scheme all interplay to affect screw stability. Understanding these factors and implementing strategies such as proper prosthetic design, optimal implant placement, correct torque application, and occlusal adjustment can greatly reduce the incidence of abutment screw loosening, enhancing the longevity and success of implant-supported restorations.
The main factors include occlusal force magnitude and direction, implant location, prosthetic design (occlusal table width, cuspal inclination), screw design and length, type of implant-abutment connection, torque application, microleakage, and parafunctional habits like bruxism.
Vertical occlusal forces tend to compress the implant-abutment joint and are less likely to cause loosening, whereas lateral and oblique forces create bending moments and separating forces that reduce preload and increase loosening risk.
Yes, retightening screws after initial torque application reduces the settling effect, helps maintain preload, and significantly decreases the risk of screw loosening.
Internal conical connections generally provide better resistance to screw loosening compared to external hex connections due to improved stability and reduced micro-movement.
Prosthetic designs with wide occlusal tables, steep cuspal inclines, and cantilever extensions increase lateral forces on implants, thereby increasing the risk of screw loosening. Optimizing these design factors helps distribute occlusal forces more favorably.
[1] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6994738/
[2] https://www.ijoicr.com/doi/10.5005/JP-Journals-10012-1087
[3] https://meridian.allenpress.com/joi/article/47/1/18/440779/Effects-of-Occlusal-Scheme-on-All-on-Four
[4] https://www.journal-imab-bg.org/issues-2017/issue1/JofIMAB-2017-23-1p1505-1509.pdf
[5] https://www.bilimplant.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Colpak-Gumus-International-Journal-of-Prosthodontics-Dergisi.pdf
[6] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SOOC2edVDic
[7] https://sci-hub.se/downloads/2019-07-20/65/10.1111@jerd.12494.pdf
[8] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7842481/
[9] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7385049/
[10] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VyRKKFj2BCA
[11] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751616123005180
[12] https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/pharmacology-toxicology-and-pharmaceutical-science/screw-loosening
[13] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1991790223004129
[14] https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2021/3595064
[15] https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/18/3/506
[16] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5397595/
[17] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0257897220307581
[18] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31407438/
[19] https://journals.lww.com/adhb/fulltext/9900/factors_influencing_abutment_screw_loosening_in.70.aspx
[20] https://journalgrid.com/view/article/rjds/12433591
[21] https://firstchoicelab.com/loose-abutment-screw-youre-not-alone/
[22] https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cre2.894
[23] https://journals.lww.com/jfmpc/fulltext/2020/09110/abutment_screw_loosening_in_implants__a_literature.13.aspx
[24] https://www.centralohioperiodontics.com/our-blog/loose-implant-abutment-screws/
[25] https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/nursing-and-health-professions/screw-loosening
[26] https://decisionsindentistry.com/article/reducing-risk-implant-abutment-screw-loosening/
[27] https://www.dentistrytoday.com/the-dreaded-loose-abutment-screw-etiology-management-and-prevention-2/
[28] https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4983/15/4/96
[29] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7842481/
[30] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41415-024-7407-7
[31] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lDQnGRoPfWU
[32] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-NW4F8WzzBU
[33] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5iNDJ6rP1Q8
[34] https://www.wjoud.com/doi/WJOUD/pdf/10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1493
[35] http://revodonto.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-32252013000400014
[36] https://totalimplantcare.iess.dental/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/06_2020_Varvara_The-Relationship-Between-Time-of-Retightening-and-Preload-Loss-of-Abutment-Screws-for-Two-Different-Implant-Designs-An-In-Vitro-Study.pdf
[37] https://journals.mu-varna.bg/index.php/ssmd/article/viewFile/9787/8797
[38] https://advanceddentistryinstitute.com.au/understanding-implant-crown-screw-loosening/
[39] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10805556/
[40] https://www.perioimplantadvisory.com/dental-implants/article/14200668/my-dental-implant-screw-loosened-did-i-miss-something
[41] https://dynadental.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/2017-Pardal-Pelaez-B-Montero-J-Preload-loss-of-abutment-screws-after-dynamique-fatigue-in-single-implant-supported-restorations.pdf
