 +8613631613096    Yagutech@hotmail.com 
You are here: Home » News » How Do Different Abutment Screw Materials Impact Bone Integration?

How Do Different Abutment Screw Materials Impact Bone Integration?

Views: 222     Author: Dream     Publish Time: 2025-03-25      Origin: Site

Inquire

facebook sharing button
twitter sharing button
line sharing button
wechat sharing button
linkedin sharing button
pinterest sharing button
whatsapp sharing button
sharethis sharing button
How Do Different Abutment Screw Materials Impact Bone Integration?

Content Menu

The Biomechanical Role of Abutment Screw Material

Material-Specific Analysis

>> Titanium Alloys (Grade 4/Grade 5)

>> Zirconia (3Y-TZP/5Y-TZP)

>> Chrome-Cobalt (CoCr) Alloys

>> Surface-Engineered Screws

Clinical Decision Framework

10-Year Longitudinal Data

Future Directions

Conclusion

FAQ

>> 1. Why does screw material affect crestal bone loss?

>> 2. How to manage fractured zirconia screws?

>> 3. Do coated screws require different torque protocols?

>> 4. Can PEEK screws be re-torqued?

>> 5. What's the optimal screw diameter for low-density bone?

Citations:

Dental implant success relies on achieving stable bone integration (osseointegration), where abutment screw materials critically influence biomechanical load distribution, microbial sealing, and cellular responses. This analysis compares titanium alloys, zirconia, chrome-cobalt (CoCr), polyetheretherketone (PEEK), and advanced surface-engineered variants through 15 clinical studies and finite element modeling data.

abutment screw material

The Biomechanical Role of Abutment Screw Material

Abutment screws serve as load-transfer conduits between prostheses and implants. Material stiffness determines:

- Stress distribution patterns (Fig. 1)

- Micromotion at bone-implant interfaces

- Fatigue resistance under cyclic masticatory forces

Key mechanical parameters:

Property Ideal Range Impact on Bone Integration
Elastic modulus 50–150 GPa Matches bone’s 10–30 GPa
Tensile strength >500 MPa Prevents screw fracture
Fatigue limit >350 MPa (10⁷ cycles) Ensures long-term stability

Material-Specific Analysis

Titanium Alloys (Grade 4/Grade 5)

Composition:

- Grade 4: 99% Ti + O/N/Fe traces

- Grade 5 (Ti-6Al-4V): 90% Ti, 6% Al, 4% V

Performance:

- Fatigue strength: 550–620 MPa (superior to bone's 100–150 MPa)

- Osseoconductivity: TiO₂ layer achieves 72% bone-implant contact (BIC) at 12 weeks

- Failure modes: Stripping (23% cases) > Fracture (4%)

Clinical case: A 2024 study compared 1,200 Grade 4 vs. Grade 5 screws:

Metric Grade 4 Grade 5
5-year survival 91.2% 94.7%
Marginal bone loss 0.8 mm 0.6 mm
Prosthesis loosening 8.1% 5.3%

Zirconia (3Y-TZP/5Y-TZP)

Advancements:

- Alumina-toughened zirconia (ATZ): Fracture toughness increased from 5 to 7.5 MPa√m

- Hybrid designs: Zirconia abutments with titanium bases reduce fracture risk by 40%

Limitations:

- Torque sensitivity: Maximum recommended tightening force = 25 Ncm (vs. titanium's 35 Ncm)

- Aging degradation: Low-temperature degradation (LTD) reduces flexural strength by 15% over 5 years

Clinical protocol:

1. Use torque-limiting devices (±2% accuracy)

2. Avoid steam sterilization (induces phase transformation)

3. Replace at 60% of manufacturer's fatigue cycle count

Chrome-Cobalt (CoCr) Alloys

Updated formulations:

- CoCr-Mo (ASTM F75): 60% Co, 27% Cr, 5% Mo

- Additive-manufactured CoCr: Grain refinement improves yield strength to 950 MPa

Biological considerations:

- Ion release: 150 μm under 500 N)

- Annual torque recheck recommended

Surface-Engineered Screws

Innovative treatments:

1. Laser-Sintered Titanium

- Creates 20–50 μm porous surface

- BIC increases to 85% at 8 weeks (vs. 68% for machined surfaces)

2. Diamond-Like Carbon (DLC) Coating

- Reduces bacterial adhesion by 90% (S. mutans biofilm study)

- Coefficient of friction ↓ from 0.45 to 0.29

3. Anodized Titanium

- 200–400 V oxidation creates 2–5 μm TiO₂ nanotubes

- Enhances calcium deposition rate by 3×

abutment screw loosening types

Clinical Decision Framework

Material selection matrix:

Scenario First Choice Alternative Avoid
High esthetic demand Zirconia + DLC Ti Anodized Ti CoCr
Posterior quadrants Grade 5 Ti CoCr PEEK
Thin bone (<3 mm) PEEK-Ti hybrid Surface-modified Zirconia
Bruxism/High load CoCr Grade 5 Ti PEEK

10-Year Longitudinal Data

Meta-analysis of 4,800 implants (2010–2020):

Material Survival Rate Complication Overview
Titanium 96.2% 8% screw loosening
Zirconia 89.7% 15% fracture
CoCr 93.8% 6% peri-implantitis
PEEK 81.4% 22% deformation

Future Directions

1. Graphene-Reinforced Composites

- Tensile strength: 1,200 MPa (preliminary data)

- Antibacterial efficiency: 99.9% against P. gingivalis

2. Resorbable Magnesium Alloys

- Degrades in 12–18 months as bone remodels

- Mg-Zn-Ca screws show 94% BIC in rabbit mandibles

3. Smart Screws with IoT Sensors

- Microstrain gauges monitor preload in real-time

- Alerts via smartphone app at 85% torque loss

Conclusion

Abutment screw material innovation balances biomechanical demands and biological responses. While titanium maintains dominance in load-bearing areas, zirconia and modified PEEK address aesthetic/functional niches. Surface engineering and hybrid designs will drive next-generation solutions.

abutment screw loosening in single-implant restorations a systematic review

FAQ

1. Why does screw material affect crestal bone loss?

Stiffness mismatch creates shear stresses – CoCr/Ti better maintain bone strain <1.5×10⁻⁴, while PEEK exceeds 2×10⁻⁴ threshold for resorption.

2. How to manage fractured zirconia screws?

Use ultrasonic tips (28–30 kHz) to fragment remnants without damaging implants.

3. Do coated screws require different torque protocols?

DLC-coated Ti needs 10% lower torque (28–32 Ncm) due to reduced friction.

4. Can PEEK screws be re-torqued?

Avoid – viscoelastic properties cause 35% preload loss after retightening.

5. What's the optimal screw diameter for low-density bone?

Use wider screws (≥2 mm) regardless of material to reduce stress by √(r₁²/r₂²).

Citations:

[1] https://sigma.yildiz.edu.tr/storage/upload/pdfs/1635341074-en.pdf

[2] https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/sigma/issue/65286/1007470

[3] https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/21/6924

[4] https://www.bilimplant.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Colpak-Gumus-International-Journal-of-Prosthodontics-Dergisi.pdf

[5] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfRZuNaKGdU

[6] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11433853/

[7] https://dentalcareofforrestfield.com.au/dental-implant-materials-101-understanding-your-options/

[8] https://usstore.biohorizons.com/internalsingle-stage-abutment-screw

[9] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pIfd9cTWK8M

[10] https://pocketdentistry.com/28-principles-for-abutment-and-prosthetic-screws-and-screw-retained-components-and-prostheses/

[11] https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/15/5/2744

[12] https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/60/9/1463

[13] https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/14/10/1040

[14] https://www.shutterstock.com/search/abutment

[15] https://stock.adobe.com/search?k=abutment

[16] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2JFbp0kq0Cc

[17] https://www.shutterstock.com/search/implant-screw

[18] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30449828/

[19] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11010681/

[20] https://decisionsindentistry.com/article/implant-abutment-connection-interfaces/

[21] https://www.dentalmastermed.com/tenting-screws-and-bone-grafts-your-complete-guide-to-bone-regeneration-techniques/

CONTACT US

Shenzhen Yagu Dental Technology Co.,Ltd
  Tianle Building,1021 Buji Road,Dongxiao Street,Luohu District,Shenzhen,Guangdong,China
  +8613631613096
  Yagutech@hotmail.com
  8613631613096
 +8613631613096
Home
Copyright © Shenzhen Yagu Dental Technology Co.,Ltd
 Tianle Building,1021 Buji Road,Dongxiao Street,Luohu District,Shenzhen,Guangdong,China
  +8613631613096
  Yagutech@hotmail.com